![]() A full update which takes 4 days suddenly takes up to one month ! In anyway using the OCR-plug-inn on my PC slows down CDS by a factor of 20. What is the reason for that ? Is there another parameter that must be changed to imply this correctly ?Ĭan we stil change something else / another parameter to fasten up CDS ? To my surprise on start up CDS changes this settings from the recommended 2 - 6 to 2 - 4 and resaves the config.xml file. For "CrawlingThreadPoolSize", no more than 2." We don't recommend to exceed 4 or 6 threads. These settings can be adjusted in the config.xml file from your Copernic Desktop Search install folder but this should not be considered as a common operation to modify those settings (Options "CrawlingThreadPoolSize" and "ExtractionThreadPoolSize" in the configuration file config.xml).On a very powerful machine, you can play a bit with "ExtractionThreadPoolSize", but it can end up slowing down if the number of threads is too high as the extractors can't execute as many documents. By default, CDS is configured to run only one "thread" to read the sources and two "threads" to extract the content. " The indexing options are configured for an average desktop computer. I also complained about speed issues and I applied this message from Max L. Is the Trial the cause? I was sure I read it was fully functional. Is this all that the software is capable of or is there something I am doing wrong? I did buy a license for use on my bosses computer but I am running this specific install as a Trial before committing to it. I see that Copernic will use at most 10-15% of the CPU and memory is 15GB used of 144GB. I went through every performance setting and also it is running in unrestricted mode. Its been almost a week of Copernic running and it has been indexing the PST files so far and it has only made it to 140k index. ![]() Initially I loaded the entire system drives (C:) but since it was taking so long I only included the C:\users folder from each system (about 1.5mil files) and loaded 150GB across 20 PST files. 2 x hard drives setup as RAID 0 specifically for this data to double read/writeĬopernic im finding very slow on the index, pretty much the same as on a mid range laptop. TWO (2) x Intel Xeon CPU E5620 2.40GHz (4 cores each cpu/8 total/16 total logical) This is much more capable than then desktop and the laptop I was using before. I just recently tried Autopsy, really nice but no search operators and it seems to have overworked the external drive and broke it (lol).ĭue to all these issues I transferred all the data to one of my physical Lab server which is an old Dell Poweredge 710 server. I have tried a handful of them out there free/open or as trials but all of them have had issues with speed or not able to perform searches as it has been requested. I have been tasked over the last several months to do a major search and to find the right program to do it.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |